Blog banner featuring author and blog title ai and ethics in education

Content Menu

How to use AI ethically in education

Hi there! I’m Yasmin and I completed the CFG Data Science Degree and a Masters in AI and Machine Learning in Spring 2025, all while working full time as a graduate engineer at Ford Motor Company. During that time, I discovered a real passion for data, wanted to grow my skillset and found Code First Girls to be the perfect pathway.

My time in tech has opened my eyes to just how quickly AI is evolving and how deeply it touches our lives. One of the most exciting, and challenging, areas is education. More students than ever are experimenting with using AI in education to support their learning, but it also raises important questions about ethics, responsibility and confidence in the classroom.

Why AI and education matter now

AI has developed rapidly in recent years, with Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, DeepSeek and Gemini becoming increasingly sophisticated. In fact, a survey from the Digital Education Council found that 86% of university students are already using AI in their studies.

There are, however, mixed opinions about the ethical use of AI in education. Some argue it undermines learning development, while others see it as an invaluable tool that can make studying more efficient, personalised and inclusive.

For the Code First Girls community, this matters because women are 20% less likely than men to use generative AI tools. As students increasingly rely on AI, what really matters is how they use it and whether women feel equally confident in doing so. Education is where confidence is built, career paths begin and AI skills for women can be developed or missed altogether.

How AI is transforming learning

Students are increasingly experimenting with AI, and there’s a clear rise in LLMs being used for assignments and homework. Sometimes that means clever prompting to help structure an essay, other times it’s building a study guide, testing knowledge with quizzes or generating revision materials. And it’s not limited to STEM, students in subjects like English, Geography and History are also embracing these tools.

However, it’s not all doom and gloom about students “cheating.” AI has the potential to support ethical, effective learning in areas like:

  • Intelligent tutoring: LLMs can provide personalised feedback and support i.e. personalised quizzes, feedback and revision guides
  • Chatbots: chatbots can offer instant clarification of tricky concepts
  • Summarisation & translation: AI systems can be used (either via inbuilt in lecture recordings or copying transcripts) to summarise lecture materials into concise notes, or translate them into a student’s first language

Cheating or learning? Navigating the ethics of AI

One of the biggest debates in AI in education ethics is whether using AI amounts to “cheating.” The truth is, it’s a complex and evolving question and the answer often lies in the individual intent of students. Using AI in education can be considered cheating if it’s employed to generate original work that is then submitted as one’s own, without proper attribution or understanding. For example, having an AI write an entire essay or solve complex math problems on an exam without personal effort or comprehension would generally fall under academic dishonesty, as it bypasses the learning process and misrepresents a student’s abilities. 

However, using AI as a tool for learning as we’ve discussed above is a different story. The line between using a tool to learn and using a tool to avoid learning is what truly defines cheating in this new era. 

Will AI replace the need for teachers?

It’s a common concern, but highly unlikely. Whilst AI can automate the daily tasks of a teacher such as grading quizzes, providing feedback on a piece of writing or delivering learning content (like explanations, visual images etc) it is highly unlikely to replace our fundamental need for a teacher.

The role of teachers extends far beyond the scope of AI. Indeed, teachers help foster critical thinking through spontaneous discussions, real time social learning, emotional support and an understanding for each students’ educational capabilities and struggles.

AI however can be an incredible assistant to teachers should they choose to utilise it. Lesson planning, marking of multiple-choice questions and other content-based learning can be developed easier and faster for teachers, allowing them the time to focus on human centric aspects of teaching. Teachers should think of AI as a guide, not an opponent. Instead, they should work with it.

Making education more inclusive with AI

So, we have established how AI can be a beneficial tool for both students and teacher. However, AI can also empower disadvantaged students and make learning more inclusive.  

  • Financially disadvantaged studentsThere are a lot of costs associated to being a student. Textbooks, tutoring and school fees (student loans for university students) can put a deep strain on finance. Whilst AI can’t pay for school fees, it can reduce costs by acting as a free or low cost alternative to textbooks and tutoring. It can generate explanations, create quizzes and provide tailored learning support without extra expense.
  • Students with additional learning needs – AI has a unique ability to personalise learning in ways that can transform access. Visually impaired students can use text-to-speech. Students with hearing loss can benefit from speech-to-text captioning. Those with ADHD or dyslexia can use AI to structure work, simplify instructions and receive real-time feedback. 

AI gives a wide range of students who might otherwise fall behind, the tools to succeed in their learning journey and allows equity between students.

Conclusion

To conclude, whilst AI can be thought to have negative consequences on the learning development of students, particularly around critical thinking or problem-solving skills, this isn’t necessarily the case. AI is already a tool students use every day, and its value depends on how responsibly it’s applied. It is ultimately the individual’s responsibility to use AI in a way that honours educational guidelines and avoids academic dishonesty. Teachers may not be able to prevent students turning to AI, but there are safeguards such as AI trackers for written work that help protect integrity.

Regardless, AI as a whole is extremely valuable to the student learning experience. Its abilities should be promoted, especially for disadvantaged students, where it can support progress and provide access to resources that might otherwise be out of reach. Likewise, teachers can use AI to free up time for deeper discussions, wellbeing, and the human aspects of learning that no machine can replicate.

I deeply encourage the use of AI in education, not as a shortcut, but as a skill worth learning in itself. Even understanding how AI works can open up new perspectives on problem-solving and critical thinking.

For the Code First Girls community, this matters now more than ever. Women are still underrepresented in AI roles and less likely to use AI tools, yet the skills gained today will shape the careers of tomorrow. Building AI skills for women at the education stage means giving the next generation the confidence to use these tools responsibly and ethically.

This isn’t just about keeping pace with technology. It’s about ensuring women lead the way in shaping the ethical use of AI in learning and in building an inclusive, AI-enabled future.

TECH HIRING IN PORTUGAL

TUI leveraged our program to hire Junior Software Developers from a cohort with 75% career switchers and 100% non-computer science backgrounds.

Commercetools logo

HIRING TECH TALENT IN GERMANY

Commerce Tools used our programme to hire entry-level tech talent for Junior Software Engineering and Junior Site Reliability Engineering roles.

Rolls Royce Logo Code First Girls Partner

ROLLS-ROYCE HIRING IN THE USA

Rolls-Royce exceeded hiring targets by 150%, bringing in software engineers, data ops managers, and scrum managers, with 83% from underrepresented ethnicities and 50% first-generation university attendees.

blank
SS&C company logo

OPPORTUNITIES IN TECH IN INDIA

blank

CLASSES TO CFGDEGREE: HIRING IN INDIA

Unilever leveraged our pipeline to place CFGdegree graduates in roles like Solutions Factory DevOps Specialist and Solutions Factory ML Ops Specialist.

The Economist Group Logo Code First Girls Partner

TECH TALENT PIPELINES IN SINGAPORE

The Economist’s program supported tech pipelines with 78% oversubscription, drawing a cohort of 84% beginner-level women, 69% from underrepresented ethnicities, and 44% career switchers.

Nike Logo Code First Girls Partner

TRAINING TECH TALENT IN HILVERSUM

IQVIA Logo

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

TUI Company Logo

TECH HIRING IN KRAKOW AND WARSAW

Morgan Stanley logo

FROM BEGINNER TO SKILLED IN HUNGARY

Morgan Stanley used our program to hire entry-level software engineers from a cohort with 99% underrepresented ethnicities and 85% career-focused participants.

Goldman Sachs Logo Code First Girls Partner

FINDING TECH TALENT IN poland

Goldman Sachs used our oversubscribed program to hire in Poland and the UK, drawing from a cohort with 63% career switchers and 44% first-generation university attendees.

Credit Suisse Logo

TECH TOPICS UNLOCKED IN SWITZERLAND

Credit Suisse enhanced its employer brand and hiring pipeline by training a cohort that was 81% new to tech, 63% from underrepresented ethnicities, and 61% career switchers.

Skyscanner Logo

FINDING SOFTWARE ENGINEERS IN SPAIN

Skyscanner’s pipeline achieved a 4% year-over-year increase in women in tech roles, with 62% beginner-level participants and 85% career switchers.

blank

HIRING TECH TALENT IN SPAIN

Capgemini Logo Code First Girls Partner

CLOSING THE TALENT GAP IN GERMANY

Capgemini’s pilot program closed Germany’s talent gap, placing 80+ graduates globally and generating job-ready candidates for junior infrastructure admin roles.

GfK Logo Code First Girls Partner

UNLOCKING TECH TALENT IN POLAND

Booking.com Logo Code First Girls Partner

ENTRY-LEVEL TALENT IN THE NETHERLANDS

Booking.com used our program to hire junior software engineers from a cohort with 94% underrepresented ethnicities and 50% career switchers.